Cross-compare multiple sources

Q: What is this prompt for?

Here are {{number}} sources: {{sources}}. Cross-compare them into three tables: (1) agreement — points multiple sources make, treat as reliable; (2) conflict — divergent claims with each source and a

Q: Do I need to pay to use it?

No. This prompt is in the free tier and is shown in full.

Here are {{number}} sources: {{sources}}.

Copy this prompt

Here are {{number}} sources: {{sources}}. Cross-compare them into three tables: (1) agreement — points multiple sources make, treat as reliable; (2) conflict — divergent claims with each source and a plausible explanation; (3) unique — single-source claims flagged as needing independent verification. End with one sentence: given current evidence, what is the most defensible conclusion and at what confidence. Do not smooth the disagreements into prose.

How to use it

Replace the {{variables}} with your own details, then paste the whole block into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any other assistant. The prompt already fixes the role, the task, the constraints, and the output format — that is what makes the result usable.

Chinese version

我给你 {{数量}} 份材料：{{材料}}。请做交叉对比，输出三张表：1) 一致点（多家都提到的，直接采信）；2) 冲突点（说法不一致的，列出各自出处和可能的解释）；3) 独家信息（只有一家提到的，标注需要独立验证）。最后给一句结论：在当前证据下，最可靠的判断是什么、置信度多高。不要综合成一段话，保留分歧。

FAQ

What is this prompt for?

Here are {{number}} sources: {{sources}}.

Do I need to pay to use it?

No — this prompt is in the free tier and is shown in full.

Does it work with any AI model?

Yes. It is plain text, so it works with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and any other assistant.