Multi-role red-team debate

Copy this prompt

Stress-test this proposal: {{proposal}}. Run a three-way debate in four rounds: (1) the advocate ({{role A}}) makes the strongest case; (2) the opponent ({{role B}}) attacks on cost and risk, naming the specific step that breaks; (3) the user ({{role C}}) challenges from 'would I actually use this'; (4) the moderator summarizes which disagreements are about facts and which are value judgments that data cannot settle, then answers 'if only one thing could change, what'. Each side must acknowledge the other's strongest point — no straw men.

我要检验这个方案：{{方案}}。请组织一场三方辩论，四个环节：1) 支持方（{{角色A}}）用最强理由支持；2) 反对方（{{角色B}}）从成本和风险角度攻击，必须指出具体会出问题的环节；3) 用户方（{{角色C}}）从「我实际会不会用」的角度质疑；4) 主持人总结：三方在哪个事实上存在分歧、哪个分歧是价值判断（无法用数据解决）、最后给一句「如果只能改一处，改哪里」。要求：每一方都要说出对方最强的一点，不许稻草人。